🔗 Share this article

Nicolas Cage is likely the ideal choice for a daring scary movie focused on Jesus Christ, however not for the motivations some audiences might assume. Actually, the star doesn't even portray the central religious figure in the new film: his role is listed only as a craftsman. The actor is cast as the Joseph within this narrative, attempting to uphold his faith while his son (portrayed by the young actor), their teenage foster child, starts to display miraculous gifts. The reason it's hard to envision any other major actor in this role is that while the role is burdened with multiple challenges, Cage himself seems almost touchingly confident that the murky, grim feature is deserving of his effort.

The Actor's Recent Film Selections

Nicolas Cage has been allocating his time more selectively lately. He still stars in more movies than most average viewers will ever see — for instance, are you aware that he has made a trio of different cowboy movies in the past three years? — but he also mixes in high-profile A24/Neon gigs such as one recent hit, another notable movie, and a further title. The Carpenter’s Son appears to be in that category, because it’s genre-adjacent, likely to stir debate, and takes a campy-sounding concept in a earnest manner.

Movie's Plot and Handling

Sadly, writer-director the director does not reward the audience's focus. The Carpenter’s Son opens in a engagingly rootless place, presented as drawing from an unknown scripture about the early years of Jesus. Cage's character, The Mother, and their child travel constantly, afraid of faith-based hostility or distrust regarding their son's unusual abilities. “Trouble pursues us,” Cage sadly observes. It goes on as dark forces focus on the household in their latest settlement, beginning with that familiar Biblical temptation for the youth.

Sometimes, the movie mirrors an demonic possession-type supernatural thriller, except that no one of the central roles are explicitly taken over. Instead, they grow progressively isolated from each other, while these forces influence a local young woman (the actress, listed as “The Stranger”) who The Boy connects to, and provides all disturbing images of a bleak destiny. Cage's role notably grapples with his place in the narrative, at times chastising his child he doesn't completely grasp.

Discussion and Caution

The subject matter is likely to stir disagreement, and the director approaches it with plenty of delicacy — overly, maybe. The concept of a adolescent facing his destined offering and tempted by unknown powers is certainly terrifying, but Nathan might be wary of appearing sensational and keen to indicate his intentions, therefore he regularly withdraws to gloomily threatening cinematography. The figures constantly ponder — the singer-actress, who displayed genuine potential in another movie, of all things — yields her acting to her character's costume, at times punctuated by a few disturbing frightening scenes.

The Star's Performance and Film's Shortcomings

At the same time, the actor toy with just the sort of exaggerated performance that his more snickering appreciators could be expecting. There is a moment (also included) in the trailer in which he erupts and yells “I’ve lost my faith!” Should such of florid outburst is included in your religious scary film, possibly a more boldly ridiculous method would take better advantage of Cage’s willingness to be extreme if needed. Instead, the film is closer to the poorer low-budget movies Cage made over the last decade — not the cheesy thrillers so much as the dramas and paranormal movies that typically appear interesting, and usually have a few choice Cage moments, but in the end seem like, frankly, cheap home video fare.

Frankly, some of those, while less ambitious, were more watchable in general. This is when I have to disregard my own dogma, not religious but professional: Years back, a respected mentor convinced me to remove adjectives like “monotonous” or “lifeless” from my reviewing language. These phrases express scant except a personal and generically described impatience, withdrawing from the duty of clearly expressing the thoughtful and sensation of watching an individual production. It’s difficult to express monotony without seeming uninteresting oneself. It's equally vague as labeling a movie “notable.” “Elaborate,” essentially.

But I must confess, I grew weary for a large part of The Carpenter’s Son. In its defense, it’s a churchy kind of dullness, not for this movie is moralizing, but as it requires a type of obedient endurance to watch it. Eventually soon after starting, the movie enters a monotonous pattern of ongoing suffering, and never really