🔗 Share this article

Through a per curiam decision, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to use a revised congressional boundary scheme that is projected to include up to five new conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 decision, issued on Thursday, grants a appeal by the state to overturn a district court's block that had rejected the boundaries in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The district court improperly inserted itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating significant confusion and disrupting the fine balance of power in elections, the justices wrote in detailing its decision.

That lower court had previously found that Texas had likely grouped voters based on their race – a act known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it passed the redistricting plan. It had mandated the state to use the maps drawn after the most recent national count for the upcoming election.

Strong Dissenting Opinion

With a strongly worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's action. She contended that it undermined the work of the lower court, pointing out that its ruling was crafted by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, The majority's order ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted political tilt, will govern next year's elections. And it means that many Texas citizens, without justification, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has declared repeatedly, is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

National Map-Drawing Battle

The court's action comes amid a countrywide battle over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in efforts to transform the U.S. House map to protect a narrow Republican majority. Typically, map-drawing takes place after a decennial population count. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to proceed with a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a wave among other states.

Republicans in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that could add a number of additional Republican-leaning seats. Democratic lawmakers, in response, have countered with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those projected gains.

Partisan Reactions

Lone Star State attorney general praised the High Court's decision. In a release, he said the order upheld Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes favorable to his party. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he stated.

In contrast, Democratic officials criticized the outcome. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the chair of a major Democratic election organization.

A top House figure said the court had yet again damaged its credibility by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.