🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.