🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to prohibit social media access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and families are watching with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

European Movement

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of countries are exploring similar measures.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM arguing that mobile devices and networks are "stealing our children's childhood". Legislation may be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban remains "a potential options under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on lawmakers to approve a law raising the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable action, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged parents to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has approved a non-binding resolution calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 without a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a solid foundation," commented a leading MEP driving the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "supported by robust research".

Last year, interest gathered behind a proposal to introduce restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the government committed to further research the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed concerns. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a girl who died after encountering disturbing social media material suggests that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of harm when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to design platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for minors," stated a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

Across America, legislation is largely happening at the state level against a backdrop of country-wide gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has passed a regulation restricting teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with additional use requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed laws requiring parental consent for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from certain figures to follow this lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Outlook

Beyond the West, further states are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, world organizations take a more measured position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

While this international conversation continues, the steps of the Australian government and its followers indicate that governments globally are less and less content to wait for platforms to act voluntarily.