🔗 Share this article

Law enforcement agencies across the United Kingdom effectively campaigned to deploy a face scanning system acknowledged as discriminatory against women, youths, and members of minority ethnic backgrounds, after complaining that a more accurate version produced a reduced number of potential suspects.

The Technology in Practice

British police use the national police database to conduct searches using historical face recognition. This process entails matching a reference photograph of a person of interest against a repository of more than 19 million custody photos to find possible hits.

Acknowledged Discrimination

The UK interior ministry admitted last week that the system was biased. This admission came after a review by the government's National Physical Laboratory found it incorrectly matched people of Black and Asian heritage and females at significantly higher rates than white men. The Home Office said it “had acted on the findings”.

“It prompts the question of whether this technology only becomes effective if users tolerate biases in ethnicity and gender. Convenience is a poor argument for disregarding fundamental rights.”

Long-Standing Problem

Official papers reveal that this discriminatory flaw has been known about for more than a year. Furthermore, law enforcement argued to overturn an initial decision that was intended to address the problem.

Police bosses were notified of the system's bias in late 2024. The government-ordered laboratory study found the system was had a higher probability to produce incorrect matches for photos of women, Black people, and those aged 40 and under.

A Policy U-Turn

In reaction, the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) ordered that the confidence threshold required for possible hits be raised to a level where the disparity was significantly reduced.

However, this directive was reversed the following month after forces complained that the modified technology was producing fewer “investigative leads”. Internal records indicate the higher threshold reduced the proportion of searches resulting in potential matches from over half to a just 14%.

Profound Inequalities

Although the Home Office and NPCC refused to say what threshold is now in operation, the recent NPL study found the system could produce false positives for Black women nearly a hundred times more frequently than for white women at certain settings.

The ministry stated on these findings: “Our evaluation found that in a limited set of circumstances the software is has a greater tendency to wrongly flag some demographic groups in its search results.”

Balancing Utility and Fairness

Describing the impact of the brief increase to the system's accuracy setting, the police records note: “This adjustment significantly reduces the impact of discrimination across legally safeguarded attributes of race, generation and gender but had a significant negative impact on operational effectiveness”. The documents further note that forces complained that “a previously useful tool returned results of questionable value”.

Broader Rollout Plans

Meanwhile, the government has opened a two-and-a-half-month public review on its proposals to expand the use of facial recognition technology. Policing minister the relevant minister has labeled the technology as the “most significant advance since DNA matching”.

Expert and Oversight Concerns

Abimbola Johnson, chair of the advisory panel for the police race action plan, commented: “We observed very little consideration in equality strategy sessions of the technology deployment even with clear relevance with the plan’s concerns.

“These revelations demonstrate once again that the pledges to combat discrimination policing has made via the equality initiative are failing to be integrated into broader operations. Our reports have warned that new technologies are being implemented in a context where racial disparities, inadequate oversight and faulty information gathering continue to exist.

“Any use of facial recognition must meet rigorous official guidelines, be subject to external review, and prove it reduces rather than compounds racial disparity.”

Official Statement

A Home Office spokesperson stated: “We takes the conclusions of the study seriously and we have implemented changes. A updated software has been independently tested and acquired, which has demonstrated no measurable discrimination. It will be tested early next year and will be subject to evaluation.

“The foremost aim is ensuring public safety. This revolutionary tool will assist officers to apprehend and prosecute offenders. There is human involvement in every step of the procedure and no further action would be taken without trained officers meticulously examining the results.”